Judge: Seattle News Outlets Must Hand Over Images, Videos of Destruction

A Washington State judge has ruled that five Seattle news outlets must abide by the subpoena to hand over unpublished images and videos of the destructive May 30 protests in Seattle.

The ruling isn’t without its limits, though. Police can only use the images to identify suspects for arson and gun investigations, and they cannot use cellphone images or videos.

Judge Nelson Lee sided with the Seattle Police Department in saying that the videos and pictures were critical to the investigation and not protected by state law.

Lee ruled that the police had met its burden to overcome the shield law: that the images were “highly material and relevant” and “critical or necessary” to prove an issue that has a compelling public interest for its disclosure. Getting the stolen weapons off the street was one compelling public interest, Lee found…. The law also required the police to demonstrate that all “reasonable and available means” to obtain the information has been exhausted.

As one would expect, the media companies strongly disagree with the ruling, saying it removes protections for journalists.

Seattle Times Executive Editor Michele Matassa Flores said the paper strongly opposes the subpoena and “believes it puts our independence, and even our staff’s physical safety, at risk.”

“The media exist in large part to hold governments, including law enforcement agencies, accountable to the public,” Matassa Flores said. “We don’t work in concert with government, and it’s important to our credibility and effectiveness to retain our independence from those we cover.”

A lawyer for the media companies has not said whether they plan to appeal the ruling or not.

When you sign up to comment you'll also receive our regular newsletter. You can find more about how we use your information here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “Judge: Seattle News Outlets Must Hand Over Images, Videos of Destruction”

  1. Michelle matassa who might you be afraid of for your staffs being at a physical risk . Those sweet harmless well meaning protesters ? Like so many spineless socialist democrats they’d rather protect the lawless thugs than the law abiding citizens.

    1. Wow, clearly Mark is a genius and the English language is his muse! Oh wait, hold on. Muse does not mean horribly mutilate the native tongue of your own country and disclose your narrow minded stupidity to the world. Sorry Mark. Hey, Mark; a stain or discoloration associated with dog excrement. Also, because we all know your inferior intellect won’t allow for you to know, a Mark is a victim and you certainly prove that don’t you! 🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👌🤛 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣@ all you right wing wastes of life!

  2. If news media have evidence of law breaking and refuse to turn it over, they should be charged with obstruction.

  3. On the quote by the Executive Editor…..Credibility blah, blah, blah. The BEST to maintain your credibility is to always just report the TRUTH and FACTS! Then WE, the people, can make up OUR OWN MINDS on where we stand. This age of “opinionated”, “political leaning”, and “lying” by reporting partial information and manipulating the truth is sickening and disgraceful. Most media just fuel the fire of hatred for a HEADLINE…..or MONEY!! I would think that reporting the TRUTH and FACTS would be fairly EASY to do if you just TRY.

  4. Michele Flores said “we don’t work in concert with government”

    What a load of manure! The media is the publishing arm of the demonrat party. They are desperate to cover up the rioting and violence; constantly referring to it all as “peaceful protestors”.

    Serve them all right if some of their ‘evidence’ is used to convict anarchists they lauded.

  5. liars. the media works in concert with the government. this is clearly a effort to clean up the ugliness of the riots so the media can put on a better image of socialism. the media or government could care less about covid 19, the riots or black lives matter. all the government cares about is switching the form of government from a republic to a socialistic form of government. the only reason the media is crying wolf is because it is getting into their pocketbook. the media routenily cries freedom of speech when they get the hammer. they do not want freedoms for anyone else.